A look at the newspapers of the day show how startling the great battle must have been. In the days before the clash in rural Tennessee, the focus of the press in the North was on General George McClellan's campaign in Virginia.
It actually took a few weeks for the name Shiloh to become known, and the first reports of the engagement referred to "a great battle" somewhere "near Corinth." Within days, reporters were able to piece together startling accounts of the brutal fighting. Readers must have been horrified by some of the details.
Thousands of troops on both sides were reported killed and wounded. And a front-page story in the New York Tribune mentioned that a horse couldn't be ridden across a field because of the dead bodies piled on it.
A month after the battle, on May 6, 1862, the New York Tribune sharply criticized the military for the lack of information it had provided:
"In short, all that the People really know of these battles, beyond the fact that our troops were beaten back on the first day, but were reinforced at night, and attacked and finally drove the Rebels on the second, they have learned from newspaper correspondents, who are quite commonly regarded and treated as barely tolerated (sometimes as intolerable) nuisances in the camps. But for them, the whole affair would have been involved in mystery, and in many points utterly inexplicable."
There's no doubt General Ulysses S. Grant and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton had other pressing business. But there is a possibility they did not want to alarm the public with details of how horrific the fighting had been.
This week in Newspaper Sunday we look at news reports of the Battle of Shiloh. Note: The links below lead to excerpts of newspaper articles at the Chronicling America archive of the Library of Congress. Click the "persistent link" on the excerpt page to view the full page of the newspaper.
- New York Tribune, April 9, 1862: Very sketchy details of fighting on April 6 had arrived at the War Department in Washington.
- New York Tribune, April 10, 1862: While the epic Battle of Shiloh had already taken place, the front page of the New York Tribune was still focused on the Army of the Potomac and its position outside Yorktown, Virginia.
- New York Tribune, April 10, 1862: The fighting at Shiloh, referred to at the time as Pittsburg Landing, received headlines and a map on the last page of the New York Tribune.
- New York Tribune, April 11, 1862: The full importance of the battle was evident on April 11, when stacked front-page headlines gave details (some of which were inaccurate).
- Staunton Spectator, April 15, 1862: A Virginia newspaper published a report on the great battle from a Confederate perspective.
- New York Sun, April 19, 1862: One of the sensationalistic New York City papers, The Sun, published an illustration of a Confederate general at Shiloh with a critical headline: "Beauregard Tried and Found Wanting."
- New York Tribune, May 6, 1862: A month after the fighting at Shiloh, the New York Tribune published a blistering condemnation of General Grant and the War Department for not having published a comprehensive account of the battle.
Illustration: Depiction of General Grant at Shiloh/Library of Congress
Related: The Battle of Shiloh
A group of New Yorkers had traveled to Baltimore by train, and joined a parade through the city to the ballpark:
"The procession started for the grounds at 1 o'clock. Of course, it was headed by a brass band. Then came the newspaper men, followed by the two nines. Managers Ward and Hanlon had a smart-looking rig all to themselves. Catchers Farrell and Robinson were in the last of the ball-players' carriages, and behind them came the usual contingent of 'leading citizens.' It was really an imposing parade.
"It seemed as if everybody here saw the parade. The windows and doorways of factories, stores, and residences were filled with heads, and the people stood on the sidewalks ten deep."
A large crowd for that era, 12,000 spectators, crowded the ballpark, where many simply stood behind ropes beyond the outfield. In the second inning the game had to be stopped for 15 minutes to allow fans who were still arriving to "find places."
The New York team lost the first game, and would lose the entire three-game opening series at Baltimore. That's not too shocking. The Orioles, in that era, were a dominant team, with stars like John McGraw and Willie Keeler, who is now remembered as one of the greatest hitters in baseball history.
The Orioles traveled to New York City at the end of April to play at the Polo Grounds. During that era baseball fans were called "cranks." So when vocal Baltimore supporters showed up in New York, the New York Evening World printed the headline, "Baltimore's Crank Contingent With Loud Voices and a Good Yell."
It rained during the April 28, 1894, Polo Grounds opener, which dampened the mood, though the Giants beat the Orioles. The rivalry between the two teams would go on all that season. The Orioles eventually won the pennant, with the Giants in second place.
However, the Giants got some satisfaction that year by winning the Temple Cup. A predecessor of the World Series, the Temple Cup was awarded after a playoff series between the two top teams in the National League (the only major league at the time).
Illustration: Amos Rusie of the New York Giants, opening day pitcher in 1894/Library of Congress
The photos in question show the facade of Grace Church, a landmark Episcopal cathedral located where Broadway bends at the corner of 10th Street. In one, a large crowd has gathered and something passing by appears as a blur.
Is it Lincoln's funeral procession? It could be. The funeral observances for Lincoln included a large procession up Broadway. There is no question the horse-drawn hearse carrying Lincoln's body rolled past Grace Church on its way to a ceremony held at nearby Union Square.
And it's also true that photographer Mathew Brady owned a studio near Grace Church. So it's conceivable, even likely, that one of his staff photographers would have aimed a camera out the window to capture the scene.
However, it's worth noting that Lincoln's funeral would not have been the only massive public event on that corner. Two years earlier, General Tom Thumb had been married at Grace Church in a colossal event promoted and publicized by Phineas T. Barnum.
Could the event in the photo be Tom Thumb's wedding? I suspect not, as the spectators in the newly discovered photo do not seem to be dressed for very cold weather. And Tom Thumb was married in the winter, on February 10, 1863.
A number of spectators seen outside Grace Church hold umbrellas to shade themselves from the sun. And umbrellas can also be seen in another photo taken along Broadway on April 25, 1865, the day of the Lincoln procession.
Could it be another event in warm weather? Perhaps. One enormous public event which comes to mind would be the funeral for Ulysses S. Grant. It also featured a massive procession up Broadway. And it was believed to have drawn an even larger crowd than Lincoln's funeral.
Grant's funeral procession in New York City took place on August 8, 1885. And the New York Tribune, on its front page the next day, mentioned crowds gathered at Grace Church.
To our eyes, the spectators near the church do not seem to be dressed for an August day. But if they had gathered for a funeral procession, it's likely the spectators would have been dressed fairly formally despite the heat.
What may rule out Grant's funeral is perhaps the year, not the season. It was 20 years after Lincoln's funeral, perhaps too late to have been captured on a glass negative belonging to Brady.
The largest public funeral in New York City before Lincoln's would have been that of Bill Poole, a bare knuckles boxer and enforcer for the Know-Nothings.
To be honest, I am very curious about the funeral for Bill Poole, and would be fascinated by any photographs of it that might surface. But it's unclear if Poole's funeral passed Grace Church. And it took place in March 1855, which is likely outside the time frame.
So it's entirely possible that the photograph spotted in a Flickr feed could be Lincoln's funeral. If it is, it doesn't tell us much we didn't already know. But it's still fascinating to look at the people in the photograph and think of what they might have been experiencing that sunny yet sad afternoon on Broadway.
Incidentally, when I first saw the photo in the Washington Post this morning I immediately recognized it as Grace Church. Years ago, I happened to live directly across the street from the church, in a college dormitory. A few months back I posted my own vintage photo of the church, which I snapped when I was 19, for Twitter's "Throwback Thursday."
Update: March 23, 2014: After thinking about this, something that nags at me is what should be in the photograph but isn't: visible signs of mourning.
Confirmed photos of Lincoln's funeral procession taken only blocks away, at 13th Street and Broadway, show mourning crepe on buildings as well as a lamppost that is shrouded with black fabric.
Yet in the newly discovered photograph there is no black crepe to be seen at all. There is a visible lamppost, and it is unadorned.
The newspapers described how the entire city was decorated for mourning. It's odd that Grace Church is undecorated in the "new" photo (especially as one newspaper report mentioned that Trinity Church, the other fashionable Episcopal church in New York, was "entirely draped in black").
And the New York City government had issued guidelines for the public which requested that men wear a "badge of mourning" on the left arm. The spectators in the newly discovered photograph don't seem to be wearing mourning accessories.
Photograph: Detail of photograph showing crowd outside Grace Church/U.S. National Archives
One immigrant from Tipperary achieved something remarkable: he rose to become a boxing champion in the brutal bare knuckles era, and then kept rising to be elected to Congress in the 1860s. Only in America!
John Morrissey, who arrived in upstate New York as a child, began brawling as a teenager. Moving to New York City, when boxing was still illegal, he found meaningful work as a political enforcer. When Know-Nothings tried to prevent the Irish from voting, Morrissey's enormous fists ensured the sanctity of the polls.
In the fight ring, Morrissey showed unusual tenacity and was nearly unbeatable. On the side, he ran gambling joints in lower Manhattan. And when his life calmed down a bit, he was offered a chance to run for a New York City congressional seat. And, of course, he won.
He became bored in Congress and only served two terms. But he was known as a genial figure in the Capitol, where visitors always wanted to shake his hand.
Known as "Old Smoke," a nickname he'd earned in a brutal saloon fight, Morrissey was beloved by the Irish community. And he acquired interesting friends in New York society, including Cornelius Vanderbilt, the richest man alive.
When Morrissey died in 1878, the New York Sun devoted half its front page to a dramatic account of his final hours. There would never again be anyone quite like Old Smoke.
Full story: John "Old Smoke" Morrissey
Illustration: John Morrissey in his boxing days/Library of Congress
The story of Solomon Northup had been overlooked for many decades, but winning the Oscar puts it into the cultural mainstream. And it ensures that his memoir, which startled Americans in 1853, will never be forgotten.
And, of course, Oscars awarded to Lupita Nyong'o for playing Patsey and to screenwriter John Ridley for adapting Solomon Northup's memoir are also worth celebrating. Ms. Nyong'o's portrayal of a tragic character was riveting. And John Ridley's respect for Solomon Northup as a man and a writer has been evident in interviews and acceptance speeches he has made during Oscar season.
It's easy to laugh at the frivolity surrounding Oscar night. But the success of "12 Years a Slave" means that other worthy stories which may have been overlooked might someday gain wide recognition. And that alone is something we should all welcome.
And, of course, the Oscar win means the film will be seen by many more people. It comes out on DVD this week, and it will likely be watched for many years.
If you haven't seen the film yet, I would recommend it. It is disturbing, of course. It would have to be. There are not many acts of violence in it compared to most movies. But the violence is palpable, brutal acts committed to characters we care about. Hard to watch, yes. But perhaps some things should be witnessed.
I recall that last year I was paying attention to the Oscars because "Lincoln" was nominated. And I was especially disappointed that Tommy Lee Jones didn't win an Oscar for his amazing portrayal of Thaddeus Stevens.
Last night the Oscar news was much better. And I must say, I could get used to caring about a Hollywood awards show every year because some awesome history has been thoughtfully portrayed.
- The True Story of Solomon Northup
- See How Newspapers in the 1850s Covered Solomon Northup
- How Solomon Northup Shared a Screenwriting Award
Photograph: Director Steve McQueen holding the Oscar for Best Picture/Getty Images
A year earlier, Harriet Beecher Stowe had published Uncle Tom's Cabin. The novel had been astoundingly popular, and it provoked a backlash. Stowe responded quickly by publishing a second book, The Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin, a compendium of true stories which had inspired incidents in the novel.
Northup included pages at the end of his memoir quoting the legal documents which had secured his freedom. And his subsequent fight for justice was mentioned at times in newspaper accounts.
The New York Times published an extensive story on January 20, 1853, about his initial attempt to hold a Washington, D.C., slave broker accountable. Northup was thwarted, as a black man was not allowed to testify in the local courts.
In New York State, the two men who had brought Northup to Washington and arranged his kidnapping were tracked down and arrested in 1854. Efforts to prosecute them met a number of obstacles, however, and the case against them was finally dropped three years later.
According to an 1857 newspaper story, Northup had to abandon his search for justice after the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which said African Americans were not citizens and did not have the right to sue in court.
Northup never received justice in the legal system. But perhaps he gained some measure of satisfaction speaking out and participating in the abolitionist movement in the decade before the Civil War.
This week in Newspaper Sunday we look at mentions of Solomon Northup in news stories from the 1850s.
Note: the links below lead to excerpts from articles at the Chronicling America archive at the Library of Congress. You can click the "persistent link" on the excerpt page to view the entire page of the newspaper.
- Vermont Watchman and State Journal, February 10, 1853: A New England newspaper reprinted the lengthy New York Times article about Northup's case in the Washington courts. (Note: His name was often misspelled in newspaper accounts.)
- Anti-Slavery Bugle, June 18, 1853: A abolitionist newspaper carried a story from a New York paper about a visit to the Washington, D.C., slave pen where Solomon Northup's descent into slavery began.
- Richmond Daily Dispatch, July 12, 1854: One of the men who arranged Northup's kidnapping was tracked down and arrested in New York State.
- Richmond Daily Dispatch, July 14, 1854: A news item about the legal case in New York proceeding against the two men who had kidnapped Solomon Northup.
- Der Lecha Patriot, July 19, 1854: Even a German language newspaper in Pennsylvania covered the Northup case.
- The Anti-Slavery Bugle, July 22, 1854: The abolitionist press followed the initial legal moves in New York State closely.
- Holmes County Republican, August 27, 1857: Four years after gaining his freedom, an Ohio newspaper reported that Northup had been prevented from speaking in Canada by an angry mob.
- Fayetteville, Observer, September 10, 1857: The incident in Canada was also mentioned in a Tennessee newspaper.
- The Anti-Slavery Bugle, September 19, 1857: The end of Northup's search for justice was explained by an abolitionist newspaper: "since the Dred Scott decision he has been obliged to abandon all hope of bringing them to justice, because he cannot sue in the United States courts."
Illustration: Solomon Northup being whipped in a Washington slave jail, as depicted in the 1853 edition of Twelve Years a Slave/courtesy New York Public Library Digital Collections
The reasons behind the shocking incident were murky. And it was suspected in the North that the victim, Jonathan Cilley, had been set up by crafty political antagonists from the South and West.
In his short time on Capitol Hill, Cilley had shown a willingness to aggressively challenge southern politicians. And his friends in the North, including his college classmate Nathaniel Hawthorne, would always believe Cilley had been a martyr to the regional conflicts which would deepen and eventually split the nation.
Henry Clay, one of the most powerful men in America, was widely suspected to have played a malicious role in arranging the violence. His connection to the duel would emerge as a political issue when he later ran for president.
The congressional colleague who fatally shot Cilley, William Graves, had chosen to use rifles in the duel. The Kentuckian was proficient with a rifle. Cilley was not.
The men missed each other entirely during the first round of shots. And they missed again in a second round. Graves then contended he had not gotten "satisfaction" for some perceived slight. On a third round of shooting he struck his target.
Cilley was hit in the leg. An artery was ripped open and he bled to death within minutes.
A few days later, on February 27, 1838, a funeral for Cilley was held in the U.S. Capitol. The nation was shocked by the incident, and it was never entirely forgotten. Henry Clay's connection to the duel became an issue in 1844, when he ran for president, and lost.
And people would wonder for decades whether the death of the promising politician from Maine was simply a peculiar misunderstanding that somehow got out of hand or part of a calculated and ruthless political strategy.
Full story: The Fatal Duel Between Congressmen
Illustration: Congressman Jonathan Cilley of Maine/Library of Congress
Accepting the award at a formal event held at USC's Doheny Library in Los Angeles, Ridley gave an emotional acceptance speech.
"Until I read Solomon's memoir, I didn't know what being a writer was all about," Ridley said. "The way that Solomon wrote, the clarity with which he wrote, and more importantly, the strength of his character, what he went through without bitterness, without hate, that really taught me something."
Struggling to hold back tears at times, Ridley also acknowledged descendants of Northup who were in attendance at the dinner.
Ridley's work has been nominated for an Academy Award for best adapted screenplay, and "12 Years a Slave" has been nominated in nine Oscar categories.
Solomon Northup had been kidnapped into slavery in 1841, and was finally freed in January 1853. His book Twelve Years a Slave was published later that year. (The book title used the word "Twelve" while the film title uses numerals.)
Arriving in the hands of the public a year after Uncle Tom's Cabin, Northup's book was bound to be controversial. Northup obviously knew his story would be questioned and even denounced by the defenders of slavery. To establish that his story was not fiction, the final few dozen pages of his book contained the legal documents related to his case.
Northup died in obscurity. But it's heartening to know that his story lives on. And, in a remarkable occurrence, he was able to share a prestigious award of the film community 161 years and one month after he was freed from horrific servitude on a Louisiana sugar plantation.
Read onward: The Real History of Solomon Northup
Photograph: Screenwriter John Ridley arriving at the Scripter Award ceremony, February 8, 2014/Getty Images
A little more than two years earlier, Gardner had earned a place in the history of photography by arriving at the site of the Battle of Antietam while dead soldiers were still frozen in gruesome poses. His graphic photographs startled Americans, who had never experienced the relatively new art of photography in that way.
After leaving the employ of Mathew Brady, perhaps because Brady's company took too much credit for the Antietam photographs, Gardner established his own studio in Washington. Lincoln, who had always recognized the importance of image in politics, would visit occasionally and sit for portraits.
The session on February 5, 1865 had a purpose which is largely forgotten: an artist, Matthew Wilson, wanted to paint Lincoln, and to save time Lincoln agreed to sit for portraits he could use for reference.
The significance of that Sunday afternoon spent in Gardner's studio only became apparent afterward. Lincoln was assassinated ten weeks later, and the photos taken by Gardner are believed to be his final studio portraits. (Gardner had his camera set up outside the Capitol and took an iconic photo of Lincoln's second inauguration a month later.)
One particular portrait taken that day captured Lincoln looking exhausted. The glass negative used by Gardner cracked, so the print he made was marred. Yet the flaw only seemed to add character to the depiction of Lincoln after years of war.
The image of Lincoln was haunting, and for decades it was believed to have been taken just days before his assassination. But it has been confirmed that Gardner actually took the remarkable "cracked negative" portrait on that Sunday afternoon in early February 1865.
Photograph: Abraham Lincoln by Alexander Gardner, February 5, 1865/Library of Congress
Not all her journalism dealt with serious social reforms, and she is best remembered today for an around-the-world voyage promoted by her newspaper, the New York Evening World.
Seeking to travel faster than the characters in the Jules Verne novel Around the World In Eighty Days, Bly left New York City on November 14, 1889, on a steamship bound for England. She kept moving, filing dispatches by telegraph from England, France, Italy, and onward across the globe.
In America, readers paid close attention as she continued to report from India, Hong Kong, and Japan. She sailed across the Pacific, set foot in California in January, and within 90 minutes had embarked on a cross-country railroad journey.
Amazingly, Nellie Bly made it back to New York City on January 25, 1890. The New York Evening World triumphantly printed a headline: "The Globe Girdled In 72 Days 6 Hours 11 Minutes."
This week in Newspaper Sunday we look at reports from Nellie Bly's trip around the world.
Note: The links below lead to excerpts of newspaper articles at the Chronicling America archive at the Library of Congress. To view the entire page of the newspaper, click the "persistent link" on the excerpt page.
- New York Evening World, November 15, 1889, 2 p.m. Special: Nellie Bly's departure was announced with the headline "30,000 Mile Race."
- New York Evening World, December 18, 1889: Her paper reported "Nellie Bly is on time" as she reached India.
- New York Evening World, December 24, 1889: "The bright little lady stepped ashore at Hong Kong yesterday," read a telegraphed dispatch on the front page on Christmas Eve, 1889.
- New York Evening World, December 28, 1889: Nellie Bly sailed from Hong Kong, bound for Yokohama, Japan, and then onward to America.
- New York Evening World, January 22, 1890: After sailing through the Golden Gate, Nellie Bly was on a train bound for the East Coast within 90 minutes.
- New York Evening World, January 25, 1890, 2 p.m. Extra: "Home To-Day" proclaimed the headline announcing Nellie Bly's imminent arrival back in New York City.
- New York Evening World, January 25, 1890, final edition: A front-page item headlined "Itinerary Beaten" detailed how Nellie Bly had circled the globe ahead of schedule.
- New York Evening World, January 25, 1890, Nellie Bly Extra: In a special edition of the World, a large front-page cartoon depicted the journey.
More: Biography of Nellie Bly
Illustration: Nellie Bly/Getty Images